Skip to content

Marcia G. Yerman

  • Home
  • Bio
  • New Media Experience
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Bio
  • New Media Experience
  • Contact

Marcia G. Yerman

  • Twitter
  • Women’s Issues
    • Feminism
    • Human Trafficking
    • Military Sexual Trauma
    • Women’s Health
  • Israel/Palestine
  • Environment
  • Culture
    • Book Reviews
    • Evolution of an Artist
    • Film Reviews
    • Music
    • Television Reviews
    • Theater Reviews
    • Visual Art
  • Interviews
  • Politics
  • Commentary
  • Human Rights
  • Events
  • Health
  • 0

    Book Reviews / Culture / Human Rights / Israel/Palestine / Spotlight

    January 16, 2026

     by Marcia G. Yerman · Published January 16, 2026

    “No Way But Forward: Life Stories of Three Families in the Gaza Strip”


    For those who want to truly understand the challenges of daily life for Palestinians in Gaza, Brian K. Barber’s book, “No Way Forward: Life Stories of Three Families in the Gaza Strip,” offers a unique perspective by sharing the personal narratives of three men whose lives are traced from childhood to middle age. This in-depth approach provides unique insights. When the book came to my attention with words of praise from Anne-Marie Slaughter, Tareq Baconi, and Avi Shlaim, among others, I was primed for an experience that would deepen my knowledge about surviving on the ground for Palestinian individuals.

    Barber’s writing style is entirely accessible, combining factual information with an engaging narrative that envelops readers in the intimate thoughts and emotions of the family, friends, and community of Barber’s subjects. It’s an essential read for those seeking a palpable look at the Palestinian challenges in Gaza.

    A Professor Emeritus of Social Science at the University of Tennessee, Barber holds a PhD. He began work in Gaza in 1994, after an invitation from Brigham Young University to consult on the study of Palestinian families. Over the past thirty years, Barber has connected with more than 10,000 Palestinian households in Gaza, East Jerusalem, and the West Bank.

    For people unfamiliar with the timeline of events in 1948, Barber delineates that when the “State of Israel was created,” approximately 700,000 to 750,000 Palestinians were either expelled or fled for safety. Four hundred villages were demolished. By the end of 1948, when a return to their former homes was not permitted by Israel, UNRWA (United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East) was created. Tents eventually evolved into adobe structures, and then into cinder block.

    Camps familiar from the war, such as Khan Younis and Rafah, are described. There are eight camps in the Strip, housing over two-thirds of Gaza’s Palestinian refugees. Barber clarifies that this comprises the “original refugees” from 1948, plus “two generations of descendants.”

    Barber traces developments in the Gaza Strip from the end of the 1948 war through the 1967 war and the seizure of Gaza. He notes that in 1971, “Israel began developing Jewish settlements in Gaza.”

    To demonstrate how the lives of his subjects, Hammam, Khalil, and Hussam were shaped by the First Intifada (1987-1993), he gives a backstory on the regulations implemented over Palestinian life. This included Israeli control over the population, from the economy and culture to legal matters and land/water rights. Part of the approach included a psychological attrition—through censorship of media, changing the names of streets and towns from Arabic to Hebrew, the destruction of historical sites, and the repression of symbols of Palestinian identity.

    Barber stated, “The Intifada was very important because that’s when the youth took to the streets in high numbers. To understand Palestinians, you must understand the Intifada. It was Palestinians asserting themselves. There was a lack of honest support by other Arab countries. They had to do this themselves.” The Iron Fist policy of collective punishment, introduced by Defense Minister Yitzhak Rabin on August 4, 1985, used home demolitions, administrative detention, and disproportionate force.

    Hammam, Khalil, and Hussam were born after the Six-Day War and have known nothing but Israeli occupation. Their stories include triumph and tragedy within the context of a reality in Gaza marked by limited job opportunities, restricted movement, violence, and surveillance. Barber emphasizes the younger generation’s extensive involvement to illustrate the impact of that period, when twenty-five percent of young Palestinian men were detained or imprisoned.

    I spoke with Barber about his efforts to bring the story of Gaza to the public. “No one else has taken readers to the micro level for three decades,” he told me. He chose his subjects in 2014 based on accessibility, their varied “personalities and approach to resisting the occupation,” and their ease with English. He then transformed the interviews into “narrative prose.” Barber also had access to women and children in culturally appropriate settings, which rounded out his portrayal.

    Barber has written: “The publicity almost always stereotypes Gaza as a pathetic and vile place and its people as angry and vengeful. It is not and they are not.”

    Our conversation also included the role of Egypt in the Gaza blockade; calls to Palestinian homes from Israeli commanders warning of imminent bombings (“Israel knows every detail of Gazan life,” Barber said); and Israel’s support of Hamas to ensure that there would be no negotiating partner.

    Barber’s portrayals are: Hammam, The Social Man; Khalil, The Defender of Human Rights; and Hussam, The Educator. Each reveals a personal evolution over four to five decades. Their stories can be seen as a microcosm of others.

    Hammam:

    Hammam’s father, Fuad, was imprisoned in “unlimited detention” before he was born. (Since the occupation began, 800,000 Palestinians have been “detained.”) Although Hammam made a concerted effort to avoid disruptive activities, at 14 he was falsely accused of setting a tire on fire. A trip to a police station and a military headquarters in Khan Younis City followed. There, he was physically abused by male soldiers and a female officer.

    Hammam decided to become a teacher. By 25, his marriage had been arranged, and his future wife had committed to completing her Bachelor’s Degree before they started a family. Hammam received a job offer with an international relief agency, where he remained for a year before becoming a researcher for a top Gazan civil society human rights organization.

    Palestinian elections were held in January 2006. Barber explains the split between the Fatah president and the Hamas legislature. The ensuing civil war between the two led to the November 2008 blockade of Gaza. The internecine conflict between Hamas and Fatah would be disruptive to Palestinian lives, along with the blockade, which severely curtailed the supply of basic daily needs.

    Hammam received his Master’s Degree in 2010 and now had three children. It was a year sandwiched between the December 2008 Israeli Operation Cast Lead and the 2012 Operation Pillar of Defense. In 2014, Israel instituted Operation Protective Edge, which saw fifty-one days of 6,000 airstrikes. Twenty-eight percent of the Gazan population (500,000 people) were displaced, 18,000 homes were decimated, and 2,200 Gazans were killed.

    By 2017, at 42, Hammam was a headmaster at his school and a highly respected member of the community. He served as a mukhtar, a village leader looked to by others for guidance. It was the same year that the Palestinian Authority reduced his salary by forty-five percent. He considered relocating his family to Egypt but decided against it.

    Three years later, at 45, Hammam had navigated the dilemma of splitting up his family, earned a PhD in educational leadership, and had weathered the COVID pandemic. Finances had dwindled, and periods of bombing barrages occurred. His one personal high note was the national recognition he received for his research “on the issue of Palestinian refugees at the level of the homeland and the diaspora.”

    Khalil:

    Khalil’s story begins at age 6 in the Khan Younis refugee camp near Gush Katif, sixteen Jewish settlements within the Gaza Strip protected by an electric fence. By 1987, when he was 17, Khalil saw confrontations with Israeli soldiers begin to escalate. That December, he was present on the first day of mass protests, but decided that engaging with the IDF was not the best path forward.

    A key incident in Khalil’s history occurred in 1988. Caught in a street action over alleged stone throwing, Khalil’s ID card was confiscated and not returned. This left him undocumented. An identity card, issued by the Israeli Security Agency (ISA), was required for all Palestinians aged 16 and older. Without possession, a Palestinian risked detention or imprisonment. That night, soldiers came to his home and ordered Khalil and his older brother to remove debris and paint over graffiti from the day’s skirmishes. Afterwards, when asked for his ID, Khalil explained that his card had been taken that morning. He was arrested.

    Blindfolded and zip-tied, Khalil and others were taken to an Israeli military compound. After several days, they were transferred to Ansar II, a prison in Gaza City, where they were required to stand outside, blindfolded, for one night and the following twelve hours. When finally questioned, Khalil explained that soldiers had taken his ID card. The officer recorded his details and told him to leave. During a second incarceration, Khalil served three months in Ansar III in the Negev. It was in prison that he learned about politics and Palestinian history.

    At 27, Khalil became director of Al-Dameer, a Gazan human rights organization. He worked there for sixteen years. Khalil spoke out about abuses under Israeli occupation, but also criticized the Palestinian Authority (which arrested him three times) and Hamas, which accused him of “creating trouble among citizens” and called him in for questioning.

    By age 45, problems with Hamas had escalated because of Khalil’s refusal to be silent. Hamas presented various allegations. The top charge was embezzlement from his organization. The stress led to illness requiring medication. His family decided he needed to leave Gaza, so Khalil spent six months recovering with relatives in Jordan. On returning to Gaza, Al-Dameer hired an independent team to review financial records. Khalil was cleared of wrongdoing and received his full severance pay.

    At 52, Khalil decided to pursue other endeavors to earn sufficient income to assist his children with their education. One received a law degree, another entered telecommunications, and the third pursued computer engineering.

    Hussam:

    In 1986, Hussam was 13. He had spent years absorbing his grandmother’s stories about the Nakba. She told him of the military offensives in 1948 and the march to Gaza from the south with 250,000 other people. Settling in the al-Nuseirat refugee camp, the family restarted their lives. Wanting to learn more, Hussam went to the public library in Gaza to expand his knowledge. Information had been banned in Gaza since 1967. The word Palestine (or variations) was not allowed in school books, nor were any maps referencing the original territory.

    To share his discoveries with his classmates, Hussam made a poster about “Palestine Across the Ages” to display on the wall. It was welcomed with interest by his peers, but the head Arabic teacher told him to take it down. “Don’t you know the soldiers could send me to prison for allowing such a thing in my classroom?” he said.

    A year after the Intifada began, Hussamjoined a group in the camp. He became a leader in organizing demonstrations on Nakba Day and Land Day. Gatherings were held secretly as Israeli military law deemed group meetings illegal. His family understood his desire to be involved in the resistance to the occupation, but they insisted his obligation to his education was equally important. Regarding potential arrest, his father gave a major imperative: “Never implicate another.”

    In 1989, when Hussam was 16, soldiers came to his family’s house in the middle of the night to arrest him and bring him to the Khan Younis military complex. On his twelfth day there, he was grilled on his activities. When he refused to give the names of others, he was beaten with wooden batons for several hours. His release came six days later, although sixty days after he was convicted of throwing stones based on the testimony of an IDF soldier. He was fined and sentenced to nine months at the Answar III prison in the Negev. This time period would cancel out his junior year in high school.

    Upon his release, without an ID and with a prison record, Hussam focused on completing his education so he could attend university. From 18 to 21, Hussam worked on an undergraduate degree in English at Al-Azhar University in Gaza City. It was also a period of disillusionment for him. He believed that the Oslo Declaration was a “betrayal and an insult,” with specific disregard for those who had fought for a Palestinian state during the Intifada. Hussam was denied an overseas scholarship for graduate studies because he wasn’t a member of Fatah. He was demoralized by the actions of Palestinian political leaders, as he became acutely aware of the corruption and “cronyism” within all factions.

    Hussam moved on to his first job, a teacher at the Palestinian Technical College, and at 22, he became engaged. Four years later, he was accepted at Brigham Young University to pursue a Master’s degree. Students sought him out for information on Islam, as well as the situation in Israel-Palestine. During this period, Hussam delved into the roots, ethics, and doctrines of his religion. It was to ground him in a way that the vagaries of politics had not.

    When Hussam returned to Gaza after a year abroad, he married his fiancée immediately. During the following decade, he had five children, and within six years, he rose to the office of vice dean for academic affairs. Like Khalil and Hussam, everyday life was impacted by the Israeli blockade, higher food expenses, and sporadic electricity.

    In 2010, Hussam went for his PhD in educational leadership. He received an offer from a university in Malaysia, a Muslim country, which was perfect for his family. He completed his dissertation in 2014, when he was 41.

    That same year, an Israeli officer called the family’s landline at 5 a.m. to inform his father: “Your house is scheduled to be bombed in ten minutes.” With four levels above ground, each housing a different brother’s family, they faced an agonizing choice: stay or leave. Were these calls a strategy of intimidation or an actual attempt to alert and save people? Either way, the result was paralyzing.

    In 2017, Hussam was a full professor at a government college. Like Hammam and 70,000 other PA workers in Gaza, his salary (and his wife’s) was cut in half. He saw his earnings decline due to the ongoing discord between the PA and Hamas, and he vigorously faulted both. By 2018, over half of Gaza’s working force was unemployed. Hussam began exploring the possibility of leaving the Strip. Instead, at the age of 46, Hussam committed to remaining in Gaza. He bought property near his in-laws’ house to build a home. The land was also next to an ongoing target of bombing by the Israelis—a power plant.

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    The second part of Barber’s book is devoted to WhatsApp messages he had with Hammam, Khalil, and Hussam over the one-year period after the Hamas attack on October 7, 2023. In his introduction to this material, Barber relates the details of Hamas assault, the reaction of Israeli military leaders, statistics on deaths (both Israeli soldiers and Palestinians in Gaza), and destruction (housing units, rubble and debris, cultural heritage). His footnotes are extensive.

    Barber expressed his view of the importance of the material to me in his comment, “There’s so much value and richness [in the correspondence]. I postponed publication to include them, a live reportage [of what it is like] to live under attack.

    With Barber’s permission, the following are brief excerpts from each man’s messages. After getting to know them and their lives through their preceding profiles, their words are even more resonant.

    Hamman:

    “Brian, the situation is terrifying. We are dying a slow death. Oh my God, what’s going on?…We may not meet again after today. We may all die at any time, my friend…No electricity at all for 27 days. Darkness is deadly…First time I am crying with sorrow. We have nothing. We are waiting. We are dying every day. Everything is destroyed. Khan Younis is destroyed…Life has become unbearable…Still waiting for a ceasefire…I have become unable to think. I don’t know where these idiots will take us.”

    Khalil:

    “Hi Brian, so far we are good. Hopefully we will be safe. The war has started to be more aggressive. It seems that they decide to invade…We are not good but we are strong enough…I am still waiting for an end of this foolishness…The news about Rafah is not good. They may invade Rafah soon…It is a real nightmare…The news focuses on the hostages and ignores the innocents who were victims for both Israel and Hamas…Nobody can imagine the stories of killings everywhere in Gaza…No one can know if s/he will survive this genocide. We live until when? Who will be next?…Death is the only certainty for the Palestinians in Gaza.”

    Hussam:

    “I am fine, but still stuck in Egypt…Currently, I am back to Gaza. They opened the borders during the ceasefire for a few days, and I barely managed to cross…I hope this war ends soon…Once again, forced to be displaced, along with all the extended family. I am in Rafah right now!…Nobody can imagine what will happen after this genocide ends. Generally, a nonstop misery and suffering is awaiting Palestinians trying to restore their lives…The psychological and the social consequences of this horrific genocide will be catastrophic to Palestinians and the world alike…The situation is so terrifying in my neighborhood…Tomorrow, we will be resuming our search for the people under the rubble…The situation in Gaza is way beyond human capacity to bear…I earnestly pray to God to bring a swift end to this genocide.”

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    Barber hopes the book will help an audience understand the accomplishments and challenges of Palestinians in Gaza. “My biggest concern,” Barber underscored, “is that enough people don’t understand what’s happening on the ground.” He pointed to the “depersonalization of Gazans” in media reports.

    Perhaps the statement that best captures that sentiment is the one conveyed as early as page 4. Barber tells of his trip to various schools throughout the Strip in 1995 to meet students. A young man implores him:

    “Please go home and tell the world that we are not all terrorists.”

    Cover Photo: Brian K. Barber
    Gaza map: Created by Khaled Alostath
    Courtesy of Brian K. Barber

  • 0

    Human Rights / Interviews / Israel/Palestine / Spotlight

    December 30, 2025

     by Marcia G. Yerman · Published December 30, 2025

    Rabbi Arik Ascherman: Human Rights as a Jewish Religious Obligation

    Photo: Courtesy of Torat Tzedek

    In the days of the Old Testament, iconoclastic prophets were not always appreciated or heeded by the Israelites. Frequently, they were seen as nettlesome presences giving voice to truths that the populace was reluctant to confront.

    Rabbi Arik Ascherman fits the bill, down to the physical look. With a white beard and an elongated build, he could easily be envisioned in a garment of rough cloth with feet shod in sandals.

    When I met him on the Upper West Side of Manhattan in December, at a private home hosting a “parlor meeting,” Ascherman was simply dressed in a button-down blue shirt and dark pants. He had the look of an ascetic but was warm and open, especially given that in less than an hour he would be addressing a roomful of people.

    I had heard Ascherman speak numerous times on Zooms, always with passion and emotion, about the work he is doing with Torat Tzedek (Torah of Justice), an organization he founded in 2017 and for which he serves as Executive Director.

    His trip to the United States had a three-part agenda. He wanted to bring the story of how the human rights of Palestinians in the West Bank were being physically violated; to talk about his experiences in trying to stop the abuses; and to recruit more Americans to travel to Israel-Palestine for on-the-ground “protective presence” action. As with any non-profit, requests for financial support were part of the equation, especially given the extensive expenses of the struggle.

    I was interested in digging into Ascherman’s backstory and ideas, and in how he arrived at where he is today. I also wanted to speak to him in his capacity as a Rabbi, to ask questions that were crushing me about the ongoing use of torture by Israelis against Palestinians.

    Ascherman related that he knew he wanted to be a Rabbi by age six (fireman and paleontologist lost out). By the time he approached his Bar Mitzvah, Ascherman was heavily imprinted and “enamored” with the ethical values he believed Judaism had to offer. He didn’t necessarily see himself living in Israel, nor did he believe that all Jews had to.

    During our conversation, Ascherman prefaced numerous statements with “The God I believe in…” or “The way I understand Torah…,” setting them up as a precursor to his concept of “faith-based” human rights activism. The key to his philosophy and the starting point for his efforts is the deeply held belief that every person is made in God’s image and that their human rights have to be protected.

    Acknowledging what Ascherman termed “a dichotomy in the Bible,” he referenced the kinds of texts he focuses on, rather than the interpretations advocated by followers of Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich. Ascherman added, “Our religion is based in debate.”

    Posing the question, “Why bother fighting for Judaism?” Ascherman observed that in the state of Israel, his views of the Bible were “in the minority.” He emphasized, “But if you’re a person of faith, it’s not something you can turn off and on like a light bulb. Our fight is to show that our Judaism is equally valid. We can’t abandon the field. We have to fight for the soul of our people and our religion, for what we believe in, and to convince more people that this is the Judaism we should follow. Our tradition is too multilayered and complex for (the assertion), ‘Judaism says…’ ”

    Ascherman discussed Arthur Hertzberg, who called for the establishment of a Palestinian state in 1967, the Jewish socialist pioneers who thought they could unite the Jewish and Arab proletariat, and Ze’ev Jabotinsky’s concepts of Zionism.

    We traced Ascherman’s trajectory, beginning with his not being admitted to the Hebrew Union College because they wanted him to gain more experience in the “outside world.” In response, Ascherman connected to the Interns for Peace program, which builds Arab-Israeli relationships. He began to see Israel as a place where he could do Tikkun Olam and make a contribution. Ascherman was ordained in 1989 and established residence in Israel in 1994. He began his leadership role at Rabbis for Human Rights North America (1995-2016).

    Torat Tzedek has had other concerns on its radar, all of which reflect a push back against Israeli state injustices and inequalities. They have included rights for asylum seekers from Africa, legal petitions to the Israeli High Court, public housing support, setting up human rights Yeshivas, fighting the evictions of Palestinians from their homes in East Jerusalem, actions to stop home demolitions, and protections for Israeli Bedouin residents of the Negev.

    For Ascherman, the whole picture evolves from the Genesis quote (Chapter 1, Verse 27), that every individual is made in God’s image. Therefore, each person’s human rights must be protected. At this juncture, I asked him about the ongoing torture of Palestinians by Israelis. Ascherman’s response to me was the following: “Jews see themselves as the most oppressed people, which has left scars on their souls and anger.” Ascherman believes that the motivation for those “bad Jews” comes from a “xenophobic understanding of Judaism,” an “us against the world” mentality. In essence, he saw that this system of interpretation leads some Jews to a belief that “our past suffering privileges us.”

    By way of explanation, Ascherman launched into a story about Menachem Begin. “Do you know what his first act as Prime Minister was?” he asked me. “It was to bring Vietnamese boat people to Israel.” He paused and followed up with, “But he also pushed the settlement movement. Begin believed that the world that didn’t lift a finger to save Jews had no right to tell us what to do.”

    We discussed the two schools of thought bequeathed to the Jews from the Holocaust. The first is that the legacy of the Holocaust gives Jews a specific responsibility to speak out on behalf of others who are being oppressed and maltreated, versus those who believe that the “world owes us. We’re looking out for ourselves, and that’s it.” Ascherman told me that he believes “Israelis see themselves as oppressed,” which leads to their logic that “our survival comes first.”

    Ascherman brought several Jewish thinkers into the discussion. He mentioned Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch, who had been prescient in his belief that having a state and the power that came with it could lead to internal conflicts, a shift toward an emphasis on state power, and a transformation away from Judaism’s spiritual aspects. Ascherman injected, “The Torah warned us not to behave as Egyptians, where might makes right.” It was hard not to think of Netanyahu’s speech, calling for Israel to become the “super Sparta of the Middle East.”  

    It was the 1967 war, Ascherman maintained, when Israel feared for its survival, which resulted in “messianic passions [being] released.” Ascherman invoked the beliefs of Yeshayahu Leibowitz, who advocated for the return of militarily conquered lands based on “moral reasons.” Leibowitz stated early on, “The Occupation is corrupting.” Yet, for other Jews, when “biblical lands” ended up in Israeli hands after the Six-Day War, they saw it as an “act of God,” commanding them to “settle and redeem the land.”

    As people began arriving, I posed a final question. “Do you think Israel is going to self-destruct?”

    “It could,” he responded. “It is very scary, this messianic fervor that has captured so many Israelis. I’ve spent most of my career fighting against occupation.  Any concept of a new order in the Middle East has to include justice for the Palestinians. We are violating the human rights of other people.”

    * * * *

    A group of around thirty-five people had seated themselves in the living room. Those present skewed older, but several were in their twenties, including a young woman I spoke to who was considering traveling to the West Bank.

    The host, Paul, introduced Ascherman. There was a simultaneous Zoom of the event underway, and a map projected on a screen, where a nine-minute video, “A Protective Presence,” was shown. The land illustration documented areas where the Palestinian communities were, overlapped by outposts, settlements, and complete zones controlled by settlers.

    Photo: Courtesy of Torat Tzedek

    “Rabbi Arik is praying with his body,” Paul said.  “On a daily basis, he confronts messianic settlers. He is a deep believer in tradition. We are at a crossroads of history. Where will our people stand?”

    Ascherman began to describe his engagement, which ranges from legal advocacy (helping a Palestinian landowner to file a complaint) to acting as a physical barrier between Palestinians and radical, often violent, settlers. “We have a finger in the dyke, but the dyke is disintegrating,” he said.

    Laying out the strategy of the settlers, Ascherman elucidated how they established shepherding outposts to take over and displace Palestinians from their lands. They bring in flocks with the mindset of, “If we can’t expel them from the West Bank, we’ll push them out of Area C to Areas A and B.”

    Although Ascherman has had successes, such as stopping the construction of a settler-built road, his tribulations have been extensive. He has been beaten, put in jail with no sustenance but water (“It was to get me out of the way!”), seen pogroms enacted upon Palestinian villages, and the cutting down of olive trees with chainsaws. “[Palestinian] communities are fleeing, sometimes at gunpoint,” he stated. “Judges in the Israeli high court don’t believe that the police can’t do the job.”

    Photo: Marcia G. Yerman

    In a lengthy (11/20/25) Times of Israel blog, Ascherman wrote a piece specifically directed to Israel’s President Herzog, refuting that the assaults upon Palestinians are only perpetrated by a small handful of “troubled youth.” Rather, as he told those gathered, “We have to accept the reality.  It’s not just a handful of youth. We have photos of soldiers working hand in hand with settlers.”

    When speaking about the complicity of Israeli security forces, Ascherman commented that some of the most violent days are Shabbat. He painted a picture of a “horde of settlers on the ridge,” Palestinian homes in flames, sheep stolen, and a volunteer with a broken arm.

    After setting the stage, Ascherman delivered his “ask.” It went beyond money, though they need that too in order to defray the cost of legal battles, and in one instance, 25,000 shekels to rebuild after an attack in October 2025. Ascherman was upfront when he said, “But tonight, I need more than that. I need your feet on the ground. There aren’t enough of us Israelis. We need you with us. If we had twenty people 24/7, it would be a game-changer. This is the reality we are facing right now.”

    Pointing to the map, Ascherman said, “All the red is under settler control. Palestinians are still in their homes due to incredible bravery, but settlers are going after villages now.” He pinpointed his commitment to Palestinian villagers. “We have to try everything, because everything is on the line. If there is anything that can redeem what we’ve done…” His voice trailed off.

    Ascherman continued. “One thing I can promise [to Palestinians], you will not be alone.” His voice broke. “Like when our doors were broken down. You will not be alone. We will do whatever, whatever, whatever we can.”

    It was a highly emotional moment, and the room was completely silent.

    Then, it was time for questions. Several were about American national policy. Ascherman believes in pushing for support and activation of the Leahy law, which prohibits American arms sales when they are used in human rights violations. Ascherman underscored, “It’s for all countries. It’s not singling Israel out. It’s holding it accountable.”

    Margaret Olin, who was sitting next to me, rose to share her experiences in the West Bank. Olin is a photographer and a historian of visual culture. She spoke of going with Ascherman on his missions to the Jordan Valley several times. Later, she related to me, “Ascherman’s pure tirelessness impressed me no end. As I got to know him increasingly better, I found him always ready to do anything to help the cause. I do not know if I have ever met anyone as dedicated as Arik.”

    Before closing out the evening, Ascherman quoted Rabbi David Saperstein, who said, “There have been times when people have to take risks, and this is one of those times.”

  • 0

    Human Rights / News / Spotlight

    December 18, 2025

     by Marcia G. Yerman · Published December 18, 2025

    CIVICUS Monitor Releases New Report: “People Power Under Attack”


    Civicus, a worldwide alliance of civil society activist networks, has released its 2025 State of Civil Society report, and unsurprisingly, things aren’t good. It’s a snapshot of the world in 2025 and reflects the heightening of “right-wing populism” alongside rising autocracy.

    The statistics underscore that in current conflicts, civilians are targeted, war crimes have been committed, and international law is out the window. Children and women are the most impacted (while women-led organizations continue to be marginalized in peacebuilding spaces). There is evidence that journalists and humanitarian workers are being singled out for their efforts to document what is transpiring and in assisting populations on the ground.

    There is no dearth of hot spots from Gaza and Ukraine to Sudan, Myanmar, and the Democratic Republic of Congo.

    The findings came to my attention because of the sections on the degraded status of the United States and Israel. America is now rated 56/100, which is “obstructed.” (Canada is “open” at 82/100) Israel is 39/100 or “repressed.” Saudi Arabia, with which Trump is seeking to build a stronger alliance, has a 05/100 “closed” rating.

    Each country gets its own page populated with articles. For the United States, a November drilldown outlines the “Expansion of law enforcement and continued suppression of critical voices.” The most recent post (6/2025) on Israel covered Gaza. The write-up featured conclusions that genocide had occurred, the International Criminal Court warrants, and the aid embargo information. On the domestic front, it documented “judicial reforms,” the crackdown on human rights organizations, and the violent response of police (Magav) to Israeli Jewish demonstrators in Jerusalem and other cities.

    There is a separate “Gaza Ground Zero” account with data. It states that “at least 1.9 million people (90 percent of Gaza’s population) have been displaced. 92 percent of homes have been totally or partially destroyed. 320 humanitarian workers and 170 journalists have been killed—some deliberately.” Also covered is the violence against Palestinians in the West Bank and Israel’s military actions in the Golan Heights and Lebanon.

    Back in America, the findings point to Trump’s extensive use of Executive Orders, including the nonsensical ones (the acquisition of Greenland). A highlight is that the winner of an election, even a fairly conducted one, can cause havoc in undermining the structures and underpinnings of democracy. Good to keep in mind as we approach the republic’s 250th birthday and next year’s midterms.

    Common threads are apparent worldwide. The populist right stokes economic fears, nationalism, and anti-immigration sentiment, mixed with “culture war” talking points, to foster an environment of ongoing turmoil. These approaches are combined with attacks on checks and balances, freedom of the press, and scapegoating specific groups.

    One of the most disturbing aspects is the proliferation of AI-generated propaganda and disinformation, spread through fraudulent social media accounts. Tech billionaires have chosen to align with the sources of “profit and power,” abandoning corporate social responsibility as a concept of the past, changing the equation dramatically. Additionally, Spyware is omnipresent.

    Trump’s behavior is unleashing parallel attitudes among other world “leaders” who were previously more moderate. Echoing Timothy Snyder, the findings note that despite severe challenges to democracy, there is “significant capacity for renewal,” which lies in “grassroots civic engagement” that can stymie “authoritarian creep.”

    Meanwhile, the situation in Europe is also not encouraging. England (the United Kingdom) does not have a rating change in this year’s report, but their 2024 rating was “obstructed.”

    I reached out to CIVICUS to get additional input. I was forwarded quotes by the Secretary General of CIVICUS, Mandeep Tiwana. He wrote:

    “We see a continued trend of attacks on people’s right to speak up, come together as a collective, and protest for their rights around the world. This year’s slide is led by states often seen as models of democracy such as the USA, France, and Italy. In a context of rising authoritarianism and populism, no country seems immune from this deeply worrying trend.

    Civic freedoms are the backbone of good governance and inclusive democracy, but fewer and fewer governments are willing to respect the agency of their people to freely and meaningfully participate in public life.

    We are witnessing a global emergency for civic freedoms.”

    Tiwana pointed to a few positive examples, such as Chile, Senegal, and Gabon. However, he emphasized, “These remain exceptions to a troubling global trend. Governments must act decisively: dismantle restrictive policies, end arbitrary detentions, and guarantee the right to protest. If they fail, they risk eroding the legitimacy that underpins their authority.”

    Ine Van Severen, who handles the CIVICUS Monitor, sent, “While each downgrade reflects the sum of particular incidents in a country or territory, together they show clearly that across the world, civic space is under sustained attack by governments and anti-rights actors. She explained, “The detention of protesters and activists has become the preferred method of governments to silence those who dissent or publicly disagree with the authorities [who] must stop detaining people and breaking up protests, and instead start listening to and engaging with people’s demands.”

    It’s not uplifting to see the United States on the CIVICUS watchlist with the text, “The United States appears to be sliding deeper into the quicksands of authoritarianism.” But this is where we are.

    An important thought to bring into 2026 and the upcoming battle to reclaim “people power.”


    Images: Courtesy of CIVICUS

  • 0

    Israel/Palestine / Spotlight

    November 17, 2025

     by Marcia G. Yerman · Published November 17, 2025

    Standing Together Solidarity Activists Come to Brooklyn

    On November 12, in the cool Brooklyn evening air, a line several people abreast snaked around the block that houses St. Ann and the Holy Trinity Episcopal Church. They were waiting patiently to enter the impressive sanctuary that seats over 600 people.

    “What’s going on?” one passerby asked me. I told her that Sally Abed and Alon-Lee Green, the co-directors of Standing Together, were on a panel. “Do you know who they are?” I followed up. “Yeah, I’ve heard of them,’ she replied before walking away.

    A young guy was handing out leaflets about the need to primary Rep. Dan Goldman. (He had the right crowd.) Ironically, the evening’s moderator, City Controller Brad Lander, has been dropping hints that he is interested in Goldman’s seat.

    I was standing next to Rabbi Abby Stein (A tenth-generation descendant of the Baal Shem Tov, founder of the Hasidic movement), who gave my friend an impromptu primer about the views of various Hasidic sects on the state of Israel and the role of the Crusaders in the history of Jerusalem.

    Inside, New York City Friends of Standing Together had their volunteers checking people in, handing out literature for an upcoming training session, and announcing their presence by wearing deep purple T-shirts that read, “Where there is struggle, there is hope.” A one-pager announced its mission with the sentence, “Find your voice in the struggle against authoritarianism in Israel-Palestine and here in NYC.”

    When everyone was finally seated, the three speakers came to the podium. The audience greeted them with a big round of applause. Lander began the conversation, announcing that they had both given him the courage to address the Occupation publicly.

    Abed, who went first, said, “We come here holding so much grief and pain. We are in this together. We are one movement fighting authoritarians here in the United States and Israel-Palestine. It is a war against all our humanity.” Pointing out that the Israeli army now holds 50 percent of the Gaza Strip and that the bombing and starvation continue, Abed emphasized, “This is by no means a ceasefire. The West Bank is on fire. The West Bank is screaming.”

    A new mother, Abed, 34, was the first member of the Joint List to serve in the Haifa City Council. She discussed building “a new alternative to the politics oppressing us,” creating a society where “justice, peace, and liberation” were linked to advancing better housing, transportation, education, and other municipal concerns. She noted that “a decade ago, there was no space to be a Palestinian citizen of Israel” while being herself. “Our political project is the most revolutionary thing I can do.”

    Green thanked the crowd for its warmth and enthusiasm and shared his backstory. Born in Tel Aviv and raised by a single mother, he became aware of economic injustice early on. While working at a coffee shop chain, he challenged his boss, who was skirting fair-wage regulations, by organizing a strike that led to the formation of the first National Waiters’ Union in Israel. This experience helped him feel a sense of personal agency. There was a Palestinian-Israeli who was in leadership during the eighteen-month struggle, which sparked an “aha” moment for him – that a shared collective interest could advance an agenda.

    Lander reflected on how the “model of solidarity” he and Mamdani espoused during the Mayoral campaign seemed to enrage many. He posed the question, “How do you think about the ongoing work when so many are threatened?”

    For Abed, who has been with the movement for eight years, it’s a dual path that embraces her desire to reach Jewish Israelis while being insistent on speaking out about her identity as a Palestinian. She questioned, “What does it mean to be part of Israeli society, especially with the current high levels of hate? When the government called for genocide, citizens normalized it.”

    Continuing, Abed stressed, “When you are serious about trying to change a society you are part of, you have to understand that society.” Abed qualified the political spectrum as ranging from the “fascist extreme right to the mild center.” This thinking yields a toolbox comprised of “military control, incarceration, and taking over Gaza.” With Israelis feeling very isolated, Abed probed, “How do we present to the Israeli population the radical idea of peace?”

    On the possibility of a new political party in Israel to advance a fresh vision, Green responded that joint slates are an aspiration, but that Standing Together will not launch its own party. “We are resisting occupation, building communities, and mobilizing the public. We have 7,000 registered members, some of whom are in political parties.” Green underscored, “Peace is not on the menu.” Challenging the current system and making that an option is. Green envisions a “peace and equality party composed of Israeli Jews and Palestinians.” He remarked on the mindset as it stands. “It’s an us or them mentality. If you want to be safe, you have to control them [Palestinians].”

    Standing Together has been working with Palestinian Israelis to promote activism, including helping to get relief into Gaza. Together, they gathered 400 aid trucks, although only 250 were allowed in. They formed a “Humanitarian Guard” to protect convoys under attack by right-wing Israelis. Their members also regularly participate in “protective presence” activities to defend Palestinian farmers from settler violence during their olive harvest.

    Shifting focus to the United States, the topic of “gatekeeping” at American college campuses came up. Green stated his unequivocal belief: “We are not part of a football match [where you] dehumanize the other. If your politics is canceling the other, you’re part of the problem.” There was an acknowledgment of the disagreements among various groups on “tactics and language.”

    During the Q&A period, the issue of BDS arose, including the fact that Standing Together has been called out by The Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (a founding member of the BDS movement). Like Jews, Palestinians are not a monolithic movement in their views or approaches. (See Peter Beinart on this BDS claim.)

    With a call to recognize a “shared humanity” as a basis for moving forward, Green repeated the oft-stated phrase: “No one is going anywhere.” Which led back to Lander’s question, “What kind of relationship do we want to be in with each other?”

    Lander called on the audience to contact their elected officials about blocking the sale of bombs to Israel. As Abed pointed out, “What is happening in Israel-Palestine is being subsidized by the United States government and your tax dollars.” Her analogy was, “Israel right now is a drunk lunatic, with the USA giving them shots.”

    The evening closed with Lander prompting Green and Abed to share, “What gives you hope?”

    Green said, “After these two years of seeing videos of Gaza, being with hostages, being in jail, and getting death threats, the movement is still together. I don’t have certainty of a timeline.” His belief is that fighting for a difference in an on-the-ground reality is a form of hope.

    “What is hope?” asked Abed. “Belief in our collective ability to make change. I want to live in my homeland. I want a safe life. I want the Jewish people to be part of this beautiful homeland. The idea is so simple.”

    Photo credits: Gili Getz

    * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

    There are currently numerous organizations mobilized to contact elected representatives on the “Block the Bombs Act” (H.R. 3565). You can do so as an individual constituent by calling both the district and the Washington office number. This link will direct you to your representative.

Environment / Spotlight

October 4, 2021

 by Marcia G. Yerman · Published October 4, 2021 · Last modified January 1, 2024

UNICEF: “Every Child Deserves a Livable Planet.”

Children are less physically able to withstand and survive severe weather occurrences. Ironically, they contribute the least to factors creating the climate crisis while suffering the most significant impacts.

Culture / Film Reviews / Human Rights / Interviews / Israel/Palestine

July 13, 2021

 by Marcia G. Yerman · Published July 13, 2021 · Last modified January 1, 2024

“The Tinderbox” — Documentary Looks at Israel/Palestine Conundrum

With a shift in American and Israeli leadership, the armed hostilities between the Israeli government and Hamas in May, and street riots within mixed Israeli cities, Diaspora Jews are beginning to question the traditionally...

Culture / featured / Film Reviews / Israel/Palestine

December 10, 2025

 by Marcia G. Yerman · Published December 10, 2025

“Holding Liat”- Grief as a Microcosm of Politics

Three months later, the film accompanies Liat to Yad Vashem, where she leads her class through an exhibit on the Warsaw Ghetto. She focuses on the separation wall that divided the Jews from the Poles and the Germans. It obviously has a specific meaning for her.

Culture / Spotlight / Visual Art

October 30, 2025

 by Marcia G. Yerman · Published October 30, 2025

“Blacklisted: An American Story” An Exhibit More Timely than Ever

“Political blacklists are a way of taking away people’s voices. If you are not allowed to participate or speak, no one can hear your ideas. You might lose friends, jobs, and your home. As you go through this exhibition, think about who is being allowed to speak and who is being silenced.”

Events / featured / Israel/Palestine / NYC / Spotlight

October 4, 2025

 by Marcia G. Yerman · Published October 4, 2025

Aziz Abu Sarah and Maoz Inon: Building the Road to Peace

“We need to go back to the Judaism of our prophets,” Maoz told me. “The opposite of what Israel is now. We can’t wait for the prophets. Where is Shalom?”

Commentary / Human Rights / Israel/Palestine / NYC / Spotlight

September 23, 2025

 by Marcia G. Yerman · Published September 23, 2025 · Last modified September 25, 2025

Hopes for the Jewish New Year 5786: “The Possibility of Beginning Again”

Clearly, it will be the people who can hold two narratives simultaneously that will lead the fight for change in the “Holy Land.”

Book Reviews / Culture / Spotlight

August 16, 2025

 by Marcia G. Yerman · Published August 16, 2025

Citizens of the Whole World: Delving into Anti-Zionism and the Cultures of the American Jewish Left

For many readers, the text will be a primer on unfamiliar names and coalitions, and the first “criticisms” of Zionism from the Jewish left in the 1930s and 1940s.

Events / featured / Human Rights / Israel/Palestine / NYC / Spotlight

August 8, 2025

 by Marcia G. Yerman · Published August 8, 2025

American Jews Say “No More” in NYC Rally

A long-time fixture in New York politics and former President of the human rights organization, American Jewish World Service, Ruth Messinger, told me, “I’m here because Torah states we can’t stand idly by. Starvation is not an appropriate weapon of war.”

Culture / Environment / Film Reviews / Spotlight

May 11, 2025

 by Marcia G. Yerman · Published May 11, 2025

“Water for Life” – Fighting for Land Rights in Latin America

“Water for Life” tells of community leaders from three separate Latin American countries who banded together with other like-minded people to make a difference. Grassroots action creates positive change in the world.

Book Reviews / Culture / Human Rights / Spotlight

May 8, 2025

 by Marcia G. Yerman · Published May 8, 2025

“Postcards to Hitler:” A Story of Individual Resistance

Reading Postcards to Hitler: A German Jew’s Defiance in a Time of Terror during the first one hundred days of the Trump regime, it was impossible not to see the equivalencies to America and to feel inquietude at the parallels.

Events / featured / Politics / Spotlight

April 25, 2025

 by Marcia G. Yerman · Published April 25, 2025

Rep. Mike Lawler: Bipartisan or MAGA?

“What’s dangerous about Rep. Mike Lawler is that he presents as a moderate, but he’s not.

Culture / featured / Film Reviews / Israel/Palestine / Spotlight

April 23, 2025

 by Marcia G. Yerman · Published April 23, 2025

“There is Another Way” – Moving Toward Israeli-Palestinian Collective Liberation

A voiceover comments on Israelis and Palestinians. “We find that we actually have something in common. That willingness to kill people we don’t know.”

  • Next Page »
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram

"The Jump Rope Line" by Marcia G. Yerman is included in the Seal Press anthology Dancing at the Shame Prom.

Published at:

  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact

Marcia G. Yerman © 2026. All Rights Reserved.